<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>90-97-S AMENDED &#8211; Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Courts</title>
	<atom:link href="https://flcourts18.org/document-tag/90-97-s-amended/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://flcourts18.org</link>
	<description>Proudly Serving the Citizens of Brevard &#38; Seminole Counties</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:34:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>1990 Admin Order 90-97-s</title>
		<link>https://flcourts18.org/document/90-97-s/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Manager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://flcourts18.org/document/90-97-s/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[90-97-S AMENDED: PROCEDURE TO PROCESS OBJECTIONS FILED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY PURSUANT TO F.S. 61.14(5)(C) - ORDERED 11/07/1990 BY O. H. EATON, JR. AUTHORIZED BY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS 88-47-CI(S); 89-1-CI(S); 89-12-CI(S) AND 89-13-CI(S).]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCERPT: “The Court has been made aware that F.S. 61.14 (Enforcement and modification of support, maintenance, or alimony agreements, or orders) has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court of Florida. State exrel. Pittman v. Stanleski, 562 So.2d 673 (Fla. 1990). Implementation of that statute has caused questions of location application. In order to implement a local procedure to efficiently process objections filed pursuant to F.S. 61.14(5)(c) . . . (Open AO for more information.)”</p>
<p>Additional Information:</p>
<ul style="list-style-type: disc;">
<li><a title="View Florida Statutes. Opens in a new browser window." href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/STATUTES/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Florida Statutes Section 61.14</a></li>
<li><a title="View Florida Statutes. Opens in a new browser window." href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/STATUTES/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Florida Statutes Section 61.14(5)(c)</a></li>
<li><a title="Review Supreme Court Decision. Opens in a new browser window." href="https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/content/download/340409/file/08-2486_Response.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Supreme Court of Florida. State exrel. Pittman v. Stanleski, 562 So.2d 673 (Fla. 1990)</a></li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
